Friday, August 23, 2013
Thursday, August 22, 2013
BEN AFFLECK IS BATMAN
Posted on 7:43 PM by Unknown
Headline kind of says it all. Nothing else to report, but there you go. Ben Affleck is the new Dark Knight for "Batman vs. Superman." This only just now happened, so not much else to say. A few thoughts do come to mind immediately, however...
Okay, Internet? Get it out of your system: Bennifer. Gigli. Jersey Girl. Reindeer Games. Armageddon. Ha ha ha. None of that matters. Literally. Affleck is basically a post-larvae actor/director at this point - nothing before "Gone Baby Gone" matters. Ben's the man.
Besides, he wasn't the problem in "Daredevil." If he played Batman/Bruce Wayne in the same basic manner as Daredevil/Matt Murdock he'd be the best one apart from Keaton, Conroy, Bader and Adam West (Fuck you, Adam West was good.)
This doesn't automatically mean the movie is that much closer to not sucking. Not using Christian Bale means this won't totally be the played-out Nolan Batman, yes. Not casting someone appreciably older than Henry Cavill means it can't be that close to "Dark Knight Returns;" but those pernicious influences are still there.
Fun Fact #1: Unless I'm forgetting someone, this makes Ben Affleck the only actor who has ever played Batman AND Superman (look it up.)
Fun Fact #2: This actually isn't a total surprise: Back when Warner Bros. was still committed to "Justice League" coming out opposite "Avengers 2," they offered Affleck the director's chair on that one with the caveat that he also play Batman. Supposedly he said no at the time. One thing changed... I wonder if the other thing has, too?
Poor Henry Cavill. Not only do they think you need Batman's help to make people want to see you as Superman again, they think you need Oscar-Winning-Megastar-Batman.
Honestly? I'm immediately fond of this decision - and not just because it means he might possibly maybe bring some (or all?) of the production of a DC movie or two here to Boston. This guy is a good actor, he can play tough, he has range... but he's also funny and "regular." I'm sure the paycheck on this is big enough that he'd do the part in helium-voice if they asked, but if they let him play Batman as something other than the one-note growling asshole we've been putting up with for the last decade he could really be something special. Enough time has passed since George Clooney - we can have a stable, semi-happy Batman again.
Seriously, though - Ben? Mr. Affleck? Please bring some or all of this production to Boston. The last Gotham City was in fucking Philly for crissakes.
Let's get THIS dull idiocy out of the way: No, Matt Damon would be a shitty Robin. Casey Affleck for Robin, though? That I like. Jennifer Garner would be a not-awful Wonder Woman, but that's not gonna happen. No, Kevin Smith doesn't need to be anywhere near this - he's probably gonna launch another fucking circlejerk podcast just to "cover" this, let it be.
Now, Matt Damon for Lex Luthor, on the other hand? I'm listening.
PERSPECTIVE: Honestly, whether or not "Batman vs. Superman" is good is ultimately a negligible thing at this point. They're not gonna stop making superhero movies anytime soon, if this one doesn't work they'll get right eventually. This is good news strictly on the basis that the guy behind "Gone Baby Gone," "The Town" and "Argo" is going to have enough Fuck You Money to make whatever the HELL he wants for the forseeable future. That's why we call these things "tentpoles," kids.
Y'know what's funny? The logic used to be that DC heroes (or, more specifically, anyone from "Superfriends") were well-known/iconic enough to sell themselves, while Marvel's roster would probably need A-list megastars to make mainstream audiences give a shit.
Okay, Internet? Get it out of your system: Bennifer. Gigli. Jersey Girl. Reindeer Games. Armageddon. Ha ha ha. None of that matters. Literally. Affleck is basically a post-larvae actor/director at this point - nothing before "Gone Baby Gone" matters. Ben's the man.
Besides, he wasn't the problem in "Daredevil." If he played Batman/Bruce Wayne in the same basic manner as Daredevil/Matt Murdock he'd be the best one apart from Keaton, Conroy, Bader and Adam West (Fuck you, Adam West was good.)
This doesn't automatically mean the movie is that much closer to not sucking. Not using Christian Bale means this won't totally be the played-out Nolan Batman, yes. Not casting someone appreciably older than Henry Cavill means it can't be that close to "Dark Knight Returns;" but those pernicious influences are still there.
Fun Fact #1: Unless I'm forgetting someone, this makes Ben Affleck the only actor who has ever played Batman AND Superman (look it up.)
Fun Fact #2: This actually isn't a total surprise: Back when Warner Bros. was still committed to "Justice League" coming out opposite "Avengers 2," they offered Affleck the director's chair on that one with the caveat that he also play Batman. Supposedly he said no at the time. One thing changed... I wonder if the other thing has, too?
Poor Henry Cavill. Not only do they think you need Batman's help to make people want to see you as Superman again, they think you need Oscar-Winning-Megastar-Batman.
Honestly? I'm immediately fond of this decision - and not just because it means he might possibly maybe bring some (or all?) of the production of a DC movie or two here to Boston. This guy is a good actor, he can play tough, he has range... but he's also funny and "regular." I'm sure the paycheck on this is big enough that he'd do the part in helium-voice if they asked, but if they let him play Batman as something other than the one-note growling asshole we've been putting up with for the last decade he could really be something special. Enough time has passed since George Clooney - we can have a stable, semi-happy Batman again.
Seriously, though - Ben? Mr. Affleck? Please bring some or all of this production to Boston. The last Gotham City was in fucking Philly for crissakes.
Let's get THIS dull idiocy out of the way: No, Matt Damon would be a shitty Robin. Casey Affleck for Robin, though? That I like. Jennifer Garner would be a not-awful Wonder Woman, but that's not gonna happen. No, Kevin Smith doesn't need to be anywhere near this - he's probably gonna launch another fucking circlejerk podcast just to "cover" this, let it be.
Now, Matt Damon for Lex Luthor, on the other hand? I'm listening.
PERSPECTIVE: Honestly, whether or not "Batman vs. Superman" is good is ultimately a negligible thing at this point. They're not gonna stop making superhero movies anytime soon, if this one doesn't work they'll get right eventually. This is good news strictly on the basis that the guy behind "Gone Baby Gone," "The Town" and "Argo" is going to have enough Fuck You Money to make whatever the HELL he wants for the forseeable future. That's why we call these things "tentpoles," kids.
Y'know what's funny? The logic used to be that DC heroes (or, more specifically, anyone from "Superfriends") were well-known/iconic enough to sell themselves, while Marvel's roster would probably need A-list megastars to make mainstream audiences give a shit.
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Monday, August 19, 2013
"Blue Caprice" Trailer
Posted on 1:56 PM by Unknown
The "Beltway Sniper" killings seem like a lot longer ago than they were (2002), but then so does the presence of Isaiah Washington in a real movie:
Saturday, August 17, 2013
"The Last Eagle Scout" - A Tea-Party Propaganda Action/Comedy From The Creator of "Will It Blend?" Really.
Posted on 11:53 PM by Unknown
Remember "Will It Blend?" A viral-marketing campaign for high-end blenders that was kinda funny on YouTube a few years ago? No? Well, it was funny. Did you ever wonder what Kels Goodman, the independent filmmaker who put the campaign together, was up to now? No, again? Well, too bad - I'm gonna show you anyway.
As it turns out, Utah's own (because of course) Kels Goodman thinks of himself as a right-wing agent provocateur. His statement to the world? "The Last Eagle Scout," a paranoid "Dramedy" action-fantasy seemingly comprised (if it's trailer is any indication) entirely of Michelle Bachman talking-points (and which it's website repeatedly calls a "dramedy." The premise? The Liberals (embodied by, I shit you not, Congressman Jude Marx) have established a "political correctness" dictatorship in America - depriving the citizenry of Baby Jesus Sanctified RIGHTS!!! to shitty snack foods, enforcing a secularized version of the Pledge of Allegiance, a "citizen's task force" (PRIVATE OBAMA THUG ARMY OH NOES!!!) etc. But when they cross the line by using a terrible accident ("false flag operation," calling it right now) as pretext to defund and dismantle The Boy Scouts, one lone heroic smug blonde douchebag with a slingshot opts to go all "Red Dawn" on their asses.
Trailer and other sundries below the jump, kiddies - I swear, as near as anyone can tell, this is not an elaborate joke, it's the real thing:
...Yeah. It's not quite the divine vintage of 9/11-broke-my-brain idiocy as, say, "Liberality For All," but it's not for lack of trying. Amid all the more obvious stupidity ("LOL because gun-free-zones in schools is EXACTLY the same thing as banning nail-clippers!") I think my favorite thing is the uber-earnest Aryan goodber playing the hero "Cliff" trying so hard to pull off the Dirty Harry/Snake Plissken/John McClane grim, disaffected hero thing. That's it, kiddo - cock that head at an angle, glare n' stammer, act like there's a weird sound only you can hear going off behind you during dialogue scenes. Reach for the stars.
Oh, and in case you thought maybe this was just some harmless goofery by jerks with cameras, check out this rancid scene from the movie itself; which introduces "Boys Of The Nation," the Evil Liberal Government's replacement for The Boy Scouts that drops outdoor activities and moral instruction for "tolerance," male/male hugging, fashion, shopping, baking and a badge called "The Flaming Torch." GET IT!!??
What, you thought you were gettin' out of this without a nice big helping of feminization/gay-bashing? You should know better than that by now.
This... thing apparently hit DVD last week or so. Has anyone had the (dis)pleasure?
As it turns out, Utah's own (because of course) Kels Goodman thinks of himself as a right-wing agent provocateur. His statement to the world? "The Last Eagle Scout," a paranoid "Dramedy" action-fantasy seemingly comprised (if it's trailer is any indication) entirely of Michelle Bachman talking-points (and which it's website repeatedly calls a "dramedy." The premise? The Liberals (embodied by, I shit you not, Congressman Jude Marx) have established a "political correctness" dictatorship in America - depriving the citizenry of Baby Jesus Sanctified RIGHTS!!! to shitty snack foods, enforcing a secularized version of the Pledge of Allegiance, a "citizen's task force" (PRIVATE OBAMA THUG ARMY OH NOES!!!) etc. But when they cross the line by using a terrible accident ("false flag operation," calling it right now) as pretext to defund and dismantle The Boy Scouts, one lone heroic smug blonde douchebag with a slingshot opts to go all "Red Dawn" on their asses.
Trailer and other sundries below the jump, kiddies - I swear, as near as anyone can tell, this is not an elaborate joke, it's the real thing:
...Yeah. It's not quite the divine vintage of 9/11-broke-my-brain idiocy as, say, "Liberality For All," but it's not for lack of trying. Amid all the more obvious stupidity ("LOL because gun-free-zones in schools is EXACTLY the same thing as banning nail-clippers!") I think my favorite thing is the uber-earnest Aryan goodber playing the hero "Cliff" trying so hard to pull off the Dirty Harry/Snake Plissken/John McClane grim, disaffected hero thing. That's it, kiddo - cock that head at an angle, glare n' stammer, act like there's a weird sound only you can hear going off behind you during dialogue scenes. Reach for the stars.
Oh, and in case you thought maybe this was just some harmless goofery by jerks with cameras, check out this rancid scene from the movie itself; which introduces "Boys Of The Nation," the Evil Liberal Government's replacement for The Boy Scouts that drops outdoor activities and moral instruction for "tolerance," male/male hugging, fashion, shopping, baking and a badge called "The Flaming Torch." GET IT!!??
What, you thought you were gettin' out of this without a nice big helping of feminization/gay-bashing? You should know better than that by now.
This... thing apparently hit DVD last week or so. Has anyone had the (dis)pleasure?
Brainstorm: Could OPRAH Save The DC Universe?
Posted on 12:59 PM by Unknown
Hear me out on this one, folks.
By tonight, the movie news of the weekend will be that "Lee Daniel's The Butler" (a not particularly good but well-intended film) will be the boxoffice champ of the weekend - probably by more so than will even be initially reported because the film press tends to ignore Sunday, a day on which "black films" almost always over-perform. Fairly or not, much like for Daniels' "Precious" a lot of the credit for that is going to be laid on the presence of media omni-figure Oprah Winfrey. For whatever reason, the fact of this made something "click" in my head:
Warner Bros. should cut whatever check would need to be cut to get Oprah to turn up in "Batman vs. Superman" as Amanda Waller.
Technically, Waller started out as a government-affiliated bad guy in mid-80s comics, but the character has evolved over time (before being ruined, along with everything else, by The New 52), thanks in part to memorable turns by CCH Pounder in the DC Animated Universe shows, into a kind of morally-ambiguous counterpart to Nick Fury (movie version); a human official unafraid to try and "manage" the presence of superhuman beings on Earth by whatever means necessary. Angela Bassett played a version of the character in "Green Lantern," but nobody cares about anything that happened in or around "Green Lantern."
Here's the thing: WB wants very badly to imitate the profitable shared-universe that Disney/Marvel have going on, but they clearly have no plan or idea how to get there - the latest gossip is that they're willing to give Christian Bale one of the biggest paydays in history to do ONE more appearance for "Batman vs. Superman," which would means they're right back to re-casting Batman for "Justice League." A character like this - who can easily turn up in multiple related films for a memorable cameo - is a good way to at least start getting there; and it'd fit with the residual Nolanized downer vibe that WB is still insisting on for "their version" to be an alternately friendly or villainous buzzkill.
The main thing that's always made Waller unique is, frankly, that she's a middle-aged, plus-sized black woman; a character type that practically doesn't exist in mainstream comics, to say nothing of holding a position of substantial power. If that's the character your casting, why wouldn't you make an offer to the actual most powerful/influential middle-aged plus-sized black woman on the planet who also happens to be a not-terrible actress? And who is really, really well-suited to the part?
Yes, you'd get a tidal-wave of reflexive fanboy hate right off the bat. College Humor etc. would have spoof material for weeks ("You get a Batmobile! You get a Batmobile!"), the whole shebang. But it would dissipate if/when they see her being good in the first SDCC sizzle-reel - besides, they're still gonna go see it. The benefit you get - namely the immediate attention of several huge audience segments that normally couldn't give less of a shit about these movies: She shows up in the trailer, even for a moment? Suddenly your on a ton of radars you weren't before. There's a whole nation of moms out there with superhero-junkie kids who would flip for the idea of Oprah turning up to essentially tell Batman to finish his vegetables and clean his goddamn room, for starters.
Also... let's face it, she's one of the best self-promoters on the planet and there's no way you don't benefit from that: DCU movies would likely have prime booking and promotion on her TV network and affiliated shows, an even bigger segment of the press is paying attention, and the only possible downside would be if she somehow proved unable to convincingly portray a character that could be summarized as "You, but a hardass and wearing a suit."
Would it be a risk? A little bit, yeah. But a better investment (with much better potential payoff) than dropping $50 Million for another 150 minutes of "BWHEREIZZET?? BWHERSTHATREGGAR!!!???"
By tonight, the movie news of the weekend will be that "Lee Daniel's The Butler" (a not particularly good but well-intended film) will be the boxoffice champ of the weekend - probably by more so than will even be initially reported because the film press tends to ignore Sunday, a day on which "black films" almost always over-perform. Fairly or not, much like for Daniels' "Precious" a lot of the credit for that is going to be laid on the presence of media omni-figure Oprah Winfrey. For whatever reason, the fact of this made something "click" in my head:
Warner Bros. should cut whatever check would need to be cut to get Oprah to turn up in "Batman vs. Superman" as Amanda Waller.
Technically, Waller started out as a government-affiliated bad guy in mid-80s comics, but the character has evolved over time (before being ruined, along with everything else, by The New 52), thanks in part to memorable turns by CCH Pounder in the DC Animated Universe shows, into a kind of morally-ambiguous counterpart to Nick Fury (movie version); a human official unafraid to try and "manage" the presence of superhuman beings on Earth by whatever means necessary. Angela Bassett played a version of the character in "Green Lantern," but nobody cares about anything that happened in or around "Green Lantern."
Here's the thing: WB wants very badly to imitate the profitable shared-universe that Disney/Marvel have going on, but they clearly have no plan or idea how to get there - the latest gossip is that they're willing to give Christian Bale one of the biggest paydays in history to do ONE more appearance for "Batman vs. Superman," which would means they're right back to re-casting Batman for "Justice League." A character like this - who can easily turn up in multiple related films for a memorable cameo - is a good way to at least start getting there; and it'd fit with the residual Nolanized downer vibe that WB is still insisting on for "their version" to be an alternately friendly or villainous buzzkill.
The main thing that's always made Waller unique is, frankly, that she's a middle-aged, plus-sized black woman; a character type that practically doesn't exist in mainstream comics, to say nothing of holding a position of substantial power. If that's the character your casting, why wouldn't you make an offer to the actual most powerful/influential middle-aged plus-sized black woman on the planet who also happens to be a not-terrible actress? And who is really, really well-suited to the part?
Yes, you'd get a tidal-wave of reflexive fanboy hate right off the bat. College Humor etc. would have spoof material for weeks ("You get a Batmobile! You get a Batmobile!"), the whole shebang. But it would dissipate if/when they see her being good in the first SDCC sizzle-reel - besides, they're still gonna go see it. The benefit you get - namely the immediate attention of several huge audience segments that normally couldn't give less of a shit about these movies: She shows up in the trailer, even for a moment? Suddenly your on a ton of radars you weren't before. There's a whole nation of moms out there with superhero-junkie kids who would flip for the idea of Oprah turning up to essentially tell Batman to finish his vegetables and clean his goddamn room, for starters.
Also... let's face it, she's one of the best self-promoters on the planet and there's no way you don't benefit from that: DCU movies would likely have prime booking and promotion on her TV network and affiliated shows, an even bigger segment of the press is paying attention, and the only possible downside would be if she somehow proved unable to convincingly portray a character that could be summarized as "You, but a hardass and wearing a suit."
Would it be a risk? A little bit, yeah. But a better investment (with much better potential payoff) than dropping $50 Million for another 150 minutes of "BWHEREIZZET?? BWHERSTHATREGGAR!!!???"
Friday, August 16, 2013
Escape to The Movies: "KICK-ASS 2"
Posted on 12:51 PM by Unknown
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
